This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-11-10
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # aleph (1)
- # asami (9)
- # babashka (30)
- # beginners (83)
- # calva (8)
- # cherry (4)
- # cider (4)
- # clj-kondo (15)
- # cljs-dev (11)
- # cljsrn (8)
- # clojure (85)
- # clojure-europe (87)
- # clojure-losangeles (9)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-norway (4)
- # clojure-spec (3)
- # clojurescript (12)
- # community-development (5)
- # conjure (1)
- # core-typed (3)
- # datomic (21)
- # docker (13)
- # emacs (13)
- # funcool (1)
- # google-cloud (1)
- # graalvm (12)
- # gratitude (14)
- # holy-lambda (6)
- # introduce-yourself (18)
- # lsp (15)
- # malli (6)
- # matcher-combinators (15)
- # nbb (15)
- # off-topic (37)
- # pathom (31)
- # portal (23)
- # rdf (3)
- # releases (2)
- # reveal (2)
- # sci (4)
- # scittle (3)
- # shadow-cljs (14)
- # squint (2)
- # tools-deps (29)
> Squint does not protect you in any way from the pitfalls of JS with regards to truthiness, mutability and equality why does squint not protect against truthiness? seems like less of a concern (with regards to interop, bundle size, etc.) than immutability/equality
@alidcastano take a look at lodash equality impl: it is both big, slow and complex. This is why
😅 1