This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-11-10
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # aleph (1)
- # asami (9)
- # babashka (30)
- # beginners (83)
- # calva (8)
- # cherry (4)
- # cider (4)
- # clj-kondo (15)
- # cljs-dev (11)
- # cljsrn (8)
- # clojure (85)
- # clojure-europe (87)
- # clojure-losangeles (9)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-norway (4)
- # clojure-spec (3)
- # clojurescript (12)
- # community-development (5)
- # conjure (1)
- # core-typed (3)
- # datomic (21)
- # docker (13)
- # emacs (13)
- # funcool (1)
- # google-cloud (1)
- # graalvm (12)
- # gratitude (14)
- # holy-lambda (6)
- # introduce-yourself (18)
- # lsp (15)
- # malli (6)
- # matcher-combinators (15)
- # nbb (15)
- # off-topic (37)
- # pathom (31)
- # portal (23)
- # rdf (3)
- # releases (2)
- # reveal (2)
- # sci (4)
- # scittle (3)
- # shadow-cljs (14)
- # squint (2)
- # tools-deps (29)
The intent of these rules is -- amongst other things -- that recruiters don't spam people via DM about jobs. We've received complaints about a newly-signed-up recruiter sending DMs to people about jobs, instead of posting in the dedicated channels, so I wanted to open a discussion here: Do people consider recruiter DMs to be "unsolicited direct messages of a commercial nature" and thus subject to instant deactivation, or should we warn such clueless recruiters first, and only deactivate them for repeat offenses?
I’m fine with a warning on first offense. We’re a nice and friendly community, and I think even the most clueless recruiter should be allowed to make a mistake. Once.
I concur, a warning on first offence, then out if repeated. Not all recuiters are bad 🙂