This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-10-02
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (1)
- # announcements (2)
- # beginners (122)
- # boot (5)
- # calva (5)
- # cider (54)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # clojure (132)
- # clojure-brasil (1)
- # clojure-italy (4)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-uk (105)
- # clojurescript (43)
- # core-async (17)
- # cursive (14)
- # datomic (60)
- # emacs (35)
- # figwheel-main (44)
- # fulcro (70)
- # graphql (1)
- # jobs (19)
- # jobs-discuss (5)
- # leiningen (5)
- # luminus (2)
- # off-topic (40)
- # onyx (2)
- # overtone (5)
- # re-frame (36)
- # reagent (29)
- # ring-swagger (20)
- # rum (13)
- # shadow-cljs (19)
- # testing (5)
- # tools-deps (25)
- # vim (5)
anyone else having problem with doc functions? e.g. C-c C-d C-r
, C-c C-d C-d
… first of all they ignoring cider-prompt-for-symbol
and prompt all the time. Even when you type the right thing, it would say “Symbol not resolved”
oh well… it seems it really requires ns to be loaded to the repl in order to be able to evaluate the forms. Sounds kinda silly. At least cider-grimoire-web
should not require to be connected and loaded in order to grab the docs
There is very little static analysis in cider but probably the symbol at point plus the namespace for core functions should be easy to do statically. If you open an issue I will try to investigate, no promise though - @ag
I’m torn. I love the Evil keybindings, I love the “don’t think about it too much” of spacemacs and its somewhat uniform interface, but I hate the fact that I can’t debug any issues that crop up when I’m using it, because too many moving parts and abstractions. What alternatives are there to have a reasonably well-behaved Emacs distribution that doesn’t try to be too clever and also plays well with Evil keybindings?
I have tried this but consistently ran into issues where I had to manually patch things. Spacemacs's layers are not tested to work independently, lots of hidden dependencies between them.
@orestis I always start with the base installation and layer the least amount of features on it as I can get away with.
My only gripe is that I’m so used to use the vim keybindings to move around so using any other editor than Vim or Evil Emacs is painful these days, otherwise I’d just buy IntelliJ IDEs and be done with it.
One issue that I have had in the past is that if you have to use multiple languages for some reason, your nicely configured editor breaks down pretty fast. I’m sure I’m doing something wrong but this is the value of using some pre-configured thing. But I guess I just need to read up on how emacs actually works. I spent the time on Vim ages ago and it still serves me well, so I guess another investment might make sense at some point.
@orestis there is also doom-emacs which is lighter than spacemacs but more “out of the box” than rolling your own
doom emacs is great, though its development lifecycle is approaching that of spacemacs: just stay on "develop" and hope things don't break
I hate that. This is what prompted me to look outside of spacemacs in the first place.
Any experience with prelude? I hope its a bit more stable coming from that particular author :)