I...guess so? The name didn't ring a bell, so I looked it up. It's a test-time dep for potemkin, for one macro. I haven't done anything with it, but sure, add it to the list (unless someone else wants to take it over)

It's really just housekeeping -- no expectations of actual maintenance unless it breaks 🙂

I finally reached out to @U066UJ2KE about this. Thanks for the nudge.

And as I did that, I see that perhaps the best way forward is just to delete this repo on clj-commons? Nothing has been done to it and no artefacts published.

Do any other libraries depend on it?

I guess they do, but I’d be curious if they did so by git sha?

Id expect some libs to depend on it, but then by something published to Clojars.

We'll give Zach a bit longer to respond and if he wants to transfer it, we can delete the fork and then transfer in. Else we might as well keep the fork since most of Zach's other libraries have moved to clj-commons and @kingmob is maintaining them...?

Zach has replied and is fine with the transfer. I was just wondering about the value of having clj-commons maintain it.

I would say it's worth clj-commons maintaining it, if it is used by any of Zach's libraries that clj-commons already maintains?

If none of those libs on clj-commons use it, then maybe it fails the entry criteria of not being sufficiently popular/useful?

It’s used by potemkin.

So then we ask for the transfer. I’ll delete our fork.

Perfect! I see we just approved accepting Riddley as well.

I’ve asked zach to transfer that as well.