clj-commons

slipset 2022-01-18T12:29:12.003600Z

I see that clj-commons has a fork of Zack Tellmans collection-check. Anyone knows why we have a fork and not a transfer of that repo? Iโ€™d prefer a transfer, so if anyone doesnโ€™t speak up, Iโ€™d go ahead and delete that repo and rather as Zack if heโ€™d be willing to transfer.

๐Ÿ‘ 3
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป 1
seancorfield 2023-07-28T21:19:57.299279Z

It seems we still have a fork of this rather than a transfer @slipset -- I'm adding ORIGINATOR and .github/CODEOWNERS everywhere they are missing in clj-commons so I'm going to assume @kingmob is the owner for this now since they've taken on a lot of Zach's old repos...

Matthew Davidson 2023-07-29T05:51:21.112909Z

I...guess so? The name didn't ring a bell, so I looked it up. It's a test-time dep for potemkin, for one macro. I haven't done anything with it, but sure, add it to the list (unless someone else wants to take it over)

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป 1
seancorfield 2023-07-29T05:53:25.447979Z

It's really just housekeeping -- no expectations of actual maintenance unless it breaks ๐Ÿ™‚

slipset 2023-07-30T12:01:41.849309Z

I finally reached out to @ztellman about this. Thanks for the nudge.

slipset 2023-07-30T16:58:33.411669Z

And as I did that, I see that perhaps the best way forward is just to delete this repo on clj-commons? Nothing has been done to it and no artefacts published.

seancorfield 2023-07-30T17:00:05.217809Z

Do any other libraries depend on it?

slipset 2023-07-30T17:01:01.093789Z

I guess they do, but Iโ€™d be curious if they did so by git sha?

slipset 2023-07-30T17:01:29.254739Z

Id expect some libs to depend on it, but then by something published to Clojars.

seancorfield 2023-07-30T17:10:26.956809Z

We'll give Zach a bit longer to respond and if he wants to transfer it, we can delete the fork and then transfer in. Else we might as well keep the fork since most of Zach's other libraries have moved to clj-commons and @kingmob is maintaining them...?

slipset 2023-07-30T17:11:26.235229Z

Zach has replied and is fine with the transfer. I was just wondering about the value of having clj-commons maintain it.

seancorfield 2023-07-30T17:15:06.314869Z

I would say it's worth clj-commons maintaining it, if it is used by any of Zach's libraries that clj-commons already maintains?

seancorfield 2023-07-30T17:15:40.436669Z

If none of those libs on clj-commons use it, then maybe it fails the entry criteria of not being sufficiently popular/useful?

slipset 2023-07-30T17:18:09.042019Z

Itโ€™s used by potemkin.

slipset 2023-07-30T17:18:21.417769Z

So then we ask for the transfer. Iโ€™ll delete our fork.

seancorfield 2023-07-30T17:18:47.149459Z

Perfect! I see we just approved accepting Riddley as well.

slipset 2023-07-30T17:21:41.310679Z

Iโ€™ve asked zach to transfer that as well.

๐Ÿ‘ 1
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป 1