This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-05-14
Channels
- # announcements (3)
- # aws (7)
- # babashka (108)
- # beginners (222)
- # bristol-clojurians (3)
- # calva (8)
- # chlorine-clover (1)
- # cider (14)
- # clj-kondo (4)
- # cljdoc (6)
- # cljs-dev (89)
- # cljsrn (13)
- # clojars (6)
- # clojure (89)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-europe (11)
- # clojure-italy (9)
- # clojure-losangeles (11)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-spec (2)
- # clojure-sweden (1)
- # clojure-uk (9)
- # clojurescript (47)
- # conjure (18)
- # datomic (7)
- # docker (1)
- # figwheel (43)
- # figwheel-main (2)
- # fulcro (31)
- # kaocha (3)
- # leiningen (7)
- # luminus (2)
- # nrepl (14)
- # off-topic (24)
- # pathom (5)
- # pedestal (5)
- # rdf (4)
- # re-frame (49)
- # reagent (12)
- # reitit (9)
- # rum (21)
- # shadow-cljs (109)
- # tools-deps (35)
- # vim (8)
- # wasm (1)
so you mean one graph may say my name is emmanuel and the other may say my name is gustavo, so which is correct?
@eric.d.scott: it really depends on the application and what you’re doing though. If you’re pulling in data from untrusted sources yes you need to care about provenance, and track it. A lot of applications can make a closed world assumption about the data; because they control or manage it, and not worry about it.
There’s a new release of grafter by the way… It now has a small clojure DSL for generating sparql property paths: https://github.com/Swirrl/grafter/blob/master/test/grafter_2/rdf4j/sparql/path_test.clj#L176-L220