Is there a particular reason why defresolver/defmutation aren't wrapped with #?(:clj) at the moment? It prevents pathom from compiling under shadow-cljs, but I was wondering if there's a reason for doing it this way that I'm missing

@jimberlage you can use pathom both on server and client

I know - it shouldn't prevent functionality on the server. The other macros are wrapped in #?(:clj), which plays nice with clojurescript. It's only defresolver/defmutation that are unwrapped, which causes compiler errors

Here's an example of a macro in cljc that works well when compiling under shadow-cljs: https://github.com/wilkerlucio/pathom/blob/2c707bbcad45d37250a89332ae889865ab8498ca/src/com/wsscode/pathom/trace.cljc#L53

https://github.com/wilkerlucio/pathom/blob/2c707bbcad45d37250a89332ae889865ab8498ca/src/com/wsscode/pathom/trace.cljc#L9

If the code were updated to do the same for the other macros, pathom would work under shadow-cljs no problem

@jimberlage hello, can you open a issue for it? or if you like to change and send a PR, welcome as well 🙏

I already have a PR open for it, if you want to check it out - https://github.com/wilkerlucio/pathom/pull/172

Really appreciate your work on pathom, btw!