@raymcdermott what would you use read+string for?

to ensure embedded forms in strings are readable and retain the original input embedded string

morning

Oh, yeah, god morgen!

Right, because with a normal read you loose the input string.

:thumbsup::skin-tone-3:

obvs if you can read the whole string, there is no added value - it's only good for many forms in one string

morning

Morning

morning

Good morning!

good morning y'all

morning!

good morning!

more fun with x/by-key today, and indeed x/reduce. I'm going reduces in by by key reduces because I heard you liked yo dawgs or something

Sounds like my future. I have some fun plans with transducers and SQL. Suddenly I can test something useful around SQL because I have transducers for the processing aspect, and they can apply backpressure to the chunking. It's amazing.

We've also been doing that for a while

There's also support for it in java.jdbc and next.jdbc now

Yeah. I'm not sure if we'll migrate for this feature or not.

no need to migrate?

we've even been using this technique well before it was available in java.jdbc (not even next.jdbc).

Oh really, you're clearly hardcore 😀 jdbc scares me.

if you're not using jdbc, what are you..?

I mean, we were using clojure.java.jdbc, not the Java stuff directly, but even before it had explicit transducer support, it was possible (kudos to a colleague)

I meant using it raw :)

yeah, not that hardcore either ;)