Clojurians Log v2

correct, specs are not vars

you could put a spec in a var with (def my-spec (s/get-spec ::foo)) if you wanted to for some reason

no, not necessary, I'm fine with it being in the registry. So if require the whole foospec.bar ns say as fspec and then resolve ::fspec/baz its just looking in the registry for that fully qualified name?

that's how I have been doing it at any rate

not sure I understand "require the whole foospec.bar ns say as fspec " but fspecs are also just specs in the registry (but their keys are fully-qualified symbols, not keywords)

s/fdef just creates a spec with s/fspec, then adds it to the registry (which is just a map) with the fq symbol as the key

sorry, that was a poor choice of alias on my part

I am not talking about function specs, just any spec in general

then yes, that is how it works

@bhlieberman93 Don't forget there's :as-alias now in a require so you can create an alias for resolving Spec names without having to actually load a real namespace.

(ns using.specs
  (:require [i.do-not.exist :as-alias idne]))

::idne/bar ;=> i.do-not.exist/bar

oh thanks @seancorfield I did not know about as-alias. That's helpful.