This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-05-21
Channels
- # announcements (2)
- # aws (1)
- # beginners (172)
- # boot (3)
- # calva (19)
- # cider (18)
- # clj-kondo (5)
- # cljsrn (18)
- # clojure (47)
- # clojure-europe (9)
- # clojure-finland (7)
- # clojure-italy (3)
- # clojure-nl (15)
- # clojure-spec (20)
- # clojure-sweden (2)
- # clojure-uk (72)
- # clojurescript (45)
- # cursive (42)
- # datomic (6)
- # duct (4)
- # emacs (4)
- # expound (48)
- # figwheel-main (7)
- # fulcro (64)
- # graphql (8)
- # hoplon (9)
- # hyperfiddle (1)
- # jackdaw (8)
- # jobs (4)
- # jobs-discuss (61)
- # klipse (5)
- # leiningen (6)
- # off-topic (72)
- # pathom (2)
- # planck (11)
- # re-frame (1)
- # reagent (3)
- # reitit (16)
- # remote-jobs (17)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # shadow-cljs (49)
- # spacemacs (12)
- # sql (3)
- # tools-deps (124)
- # vim (64)
- # xtdb (4)
question about ataraxy metadata syntax for middlewares: the order of middlewares are not guaranteed because they are hashmap keys produced by clojure reader. How do I denote the exact order? any alternative syntax?
Currently I think the only way to guarantee the order is to compose the two middleware functions.
I’ve been considering a way of determining the order of metadata through dependencies that might help in future.
I think it would be convenient to compose middlewares with config like this:
{:duct.router/ataraxy
{:routes {[:get "/path"] ^:wrap-c [:some-handler]}
:middleware
{:wrap-a #ig/ref ...
:wrap-b #ig/ref ...
:wrap-c [:wrap-a :wrap-b]}}}