This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-08-15
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (101)
- # boot (13)
- # cider (38)
- # cljdoc (10)
- # cljs-dev (37)
- # cljsrn (6)
- # clojure (74)
- # clojure-dev (8)
- # clojure-europe (3)
- # clojure-italy (36)
- # clojure-losangeles (2)
- # clojure-nl (5)
- # clojure-spec (15)
- # clojure-uk (49)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (2)
- # clojurescript (52)
- # cursive (6)
- # datomic (19)
- # fulcro (35)
- # graalvm (16)
- # graphql (4)
- # kaocha (1)
- # leiningen (26)
- # luminus (3)
- # re-frame (10)
- # reagent (14)
- # ring-swagger (37)
- # rum (2)
- # schema (4)
- # shadow-cljs (148)
- # spacemacs (13)
- # specter (1)
- # sql (46)
- # tools-deps (3)
- # vim (4)
@lee hey! when you say analysis runner I’m thinking of the files in here https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/tree/master/modules/analysis-runner/src/cljdoc/analysis but there’s not a lot of post processing going on there IIRC.
Definitely open to extract the stuff we use from codox into it’s own project and I’m realizing that I might have said I’d do that a few times 🙂
This has some stuff I did a few months ago. Working towards what I think you’re describing above. Dropped the ball mid air 🙂
For naming I was just thinking of cljdoc-analyzer but I’m all in for a cooler name
thanks @martinklepsch, cljdoc-analyzer sounds fine as a project name to me (my current working name is metadata-interpretata ). Yeah that’s the analysis runner I’m talking about. There’s not a ton of post-processing, but I thought why not just have cljdoc-analyzer return the data we actually want (this might have been just me being impatient trying to get the data I want for my own purposes ). I’m also trying to keep in mind that this project might be useful to others. For example, I wonder if codox would be interested in delegating analysis to cljdoc-analyzer. And clj-kondo can’t possibly ever know all the metadata manipulations projects do, maybe the output from cljdoc-analyzer could be useful to it somehow. Do you have thoughts on this? Were you focusing only on cljdoc-only usage or keeping the broader community in mind?
If we can build something that’s useful for the broader community I’m all for that! :) if you want we can have a short call some time to discuss this. My email address is <mailto:[email protected]|[email protected]> - send me an invite to something if you feel like :)
thanks, I will ponder a bit first. I’ll check with weavejester if he is at all interested. If not, then carefully maintaining compatibility with his world is probably not worth the investment.
@martinklepsch I’ll muck around under https://github.com/lread/cljdoc-analyzer for now with the plan to transfer to cljdoc org when things stabilize a bit.