Fork me on GitHub

@martinklepsch, I was starting to use cljdoc fork/branch of codox for my own purposes - to do a sanity test compare of apis for rewrite-cljs vs rewrite-clj vs rewrite-cljc. And… I think I now see what you were talking about way back when I did that PR for cljs import-vars support. It is kind of annoying to have all that post-processing work in the cljdoc analysis runner. Do you remember if that was your main thought?


I don’t think it would be too much work to extract cldoc codox to a new project that focused on returning resolved metadata (ie import-vars tricks included). It might also be useful for others. But what do call this project? honest-api? nolie-metadata? nolie-api? metaveritas?