This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-03-29
Channels
- # announcements (4)
- # architecture (25)
- # babashka (23)
- # beginners (56)
- # boot (4)
- # calva (1)
- # cider (1)
- # cljs-dev (15)
- # clojure (135)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-nl (21)
- # clojure-uk (61)
- # clojurescript (47)
- # community-development (4)
- # cryogen (11)
- # cursive (11)
- # data-science (11)
- # fulcro (25)
- # funcool (5)
- # graalvm (1)
- # graphql (4)
- # kaocha (4)
- # lambdaisland (20)
- # lumo (7)
- # meander (14)
- # off-topic (9)
- # pathom (2)
- # portkey (1)
- # re-frame (5)
- # reagent (53)
- # reitit (2)
- # ring (3)
- # shadow-cljs (32)
- # spacemacs (4)
- # sql (34)
- # testing (1)
- # tools-deps (3)
Github action implemented with bb! https://twitter.com/rymndhng/status/1244137620726099970?s=20
So Babashka can be used instead of Typescript 🙂 I didn’t realize that. I guess any language can be used through docker https://help.github.com/en/actions/building-actions/creating-a-docker-container-action Nice!
@dominicm the main blocker is nobody working on it 🙂 https://github.com/borkdude/babashka/issues/241#issuecomment-605434234
Off the top of my head, http://sr.ht might have ARM support. But I wouldn't comment until I've verified that 🙂 Circle might also do too.
compile. we're getting by on CircleCI right now, so it would probably be ok for now, but I don't know for how long. I'm considering moving away from Circle because of the memory limit.
we're now using 19.3.1 which can compile with 4GB, but 20.0.0 already couldn't. it required 1GB more. I have made an issue about this at oracle/graal though
to prototype you can compile sci instead of bb. it also has a script/compile
script similar to bb, but it compiles faster because it has less code to analyze