This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-02-03
Channels
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (160)
- # boot (174)
- # cider (57)
- # cljs-dev (16)
- # cljsrn (5)
- # clojure (144)
- # clojure-argentina (1)
- # clojure-austin (6)
- # clojure-finland (2)
- # clojure-france (4)
- # clojure-russia (185)
- # clojure-serbia (4)
- # clojure-spec (61)
- # clojure-uk (126)
- # clojurescript (212)
- # community-development (7)
- # core-async (2)
- # cursive (17)
- # datomic (210)
- # emacs (10)
- # euroclojure (2)
- # gsoc (23)
- # hoplon (86)
- # jobs (8)
- # lein-figwheel (9)
- # luminus (19)
- # lumo (12)
- # off-topic (4)
- # om (14)
- # om-next (6)
- # pedestal (38)
- # perun (11)
- # planck (35)
- # portland-or (2)
- # ring (1)
- # ring-swagger (28)
- # specter (6)
- # untangled (6)
- # yada (2)
With no Datomic at all, you can still use the #vase/respond and #vase/redirect literals. They're not terribly interesting by themselves. You can also write your own literals and use the rest of Vase's plumbing.
It's pretty easy. You just don't run a transactor. ๐ Then use "datomic:<mem://dbname>" as the URI.
Anyone have Swagger working with pedestal?
With spec instead of schema
Similar to this: https://github.com/nubank/pedestal-swagger
@tetriscodes I have a client using pedestal-api, but none with pedestal-swagger.
the pedestal-swagger is fork from route-swagger which uses ring-swagger and is used by pedestal-api, which is the most up-to-date impl for pedestal.
haha. We have done the ring-swagger and now porting it for spec with same api for routing libs (https://github.com/metosin/spec-swagger). Waiting for spec internals to cool down. Should work with pedestal-api nicely. Haven't talked with Frankie about his plans with pedestal-api thou.