This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-12-02
Channels
- # adventofcode (63)
- # announcements (21)
- # babashka-sci-dev (1)
- # beginners (24)
- # biff (2)
- # calva (78)
- # cherry (6)
- # clj-commons (3)
- # clj-kondo (7)
- # clojure (91)
- # clojure-austin (2)
- # clojure-bay-area (6)
- # clojure-denmark (1)
- # clojure-europe (45)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-norway (16)
- # clojure-portugal (3)
- # clojure-uk (1)
- # clojurescript (20)
- # conjure (11)
- # datalevin (13)
- # datomic (5)
- # emacs (14)
- # etaoin (15)
- # events (7)
- # fulcro (9)
- # funcool (1)
- # honeysql (26)
- # joyride (4)
- # kaocha (3)
- # lambdaisland (2)
- # malli (7)
- # off-topic (22)
- # pathom (29)
- # portal (58)
- # practicalli (8)
- # rdf (25)
- # reagent (14)
- # sci (3)
- # scittle (37)
- # shadow-cljs (10)
- # slack-help (2)
- # spacemacs (7)
- # sql (7)
- # tools-deps (1)
- # xtdb (2)
just tried updating fulcro-rad-datomic
and getting
#error{:cause "No such var: d/index-pull",
:via [{:type clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException,
:message "Syntax error compiling at (com/fulcrologic/rad/database_adapters/datomic.clj:465:1).",
also got:
WARNING: requiring-resolve already refers to: #'clojure.core/requiring-resolve in namespace: datomic.common, being replaced by: #'datomic.common/requiring-resolve
Not sure if related
Notably, im trying to just use datomic-cloud, and I’m not requiring database-adapters.datomic
in my codebase AFAICTdowngrading to 1.1.0 fixed things for now
Based on the form state demo in the developer's guide book, I understand that fs/add-form-config* is initializing the sub form state. But if the sub form component is a union component like the one in section 7.3 (Unions), it does not initialize the sub-form state when I call fs/add-form-config* on the parent form ident. Is there support for this situation? Am I missing something in the union component that would tell fulcro to look for a sub form in the union component? Does anyone have a suggested workaround if this situation is not covered? Thanks.
Thanks. I thought that it could use the ident fn, but that is for the query, not the component. So it would need another way of determining form component in order to determine sub form fields...