This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-06-23
Channels
- # announcements (11)
- # babashka (35)
- # beginners (110)
- # calva (2)
- # cider (46)
- # clara (5)
- # clj-kondo (29)
- # cljdoc (4)
- # cljsrn (59)
- # clojure (163)
- # clojure-brasil (3)
- # clojure-europe (24)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-nl (10)
- # clojure-sweden (1)
- # clojure-uk (36)
- # clojurescript (58)
- # conjure (24)
- # cursive (19)
- # data-science (14)
- # datascript (1)
- # datomic (10)
- # docker (3)
- # expound (6)
- # figwheel-main (17)
- # fulcro (16)
- # graalvm (1)
- # leiningen (9)
- # malli (11)
- # off-topic (22)
- # parinfer (1)
- # pathom (1)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (18)
- # reitit (3)
- # ring (3)
- # shadow-cljs (8)
- # spacemacs (3)
- # specter (79)
- # sql (20)
- # tools-deps (25)
- # vim (4)
- # xtdb (8)
Hi, we are running an on-prem Datomic installation, with two memcached servers. My question is, are these 2 memcached servers redundant? In other words, could I take one offline, upgrade the underlying machine and bring it back online without any hickups?
Donno about hiccups, but the memcached servers are not replicas: each has half the segments
What you really want to know is how will peers behave when a memcached becomes unreachable
I know everything will still work but I’m unsure if there will be extra blocking timeouts added to peer work or not.
if it doesn’t return within that very short window the peer will go to storage instead
Thanks a lot for the explanations! helped in my understanding!