This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-12-03
Channels
- # adventofcode (198)
- # aleph (10)
- # announcements (7)
- # aws (17)
- # beginners (353)
- # boot (1)
- # calva (13)
- # cider (18)
- # cljdoc (2)
- # cljs-dev (11)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (87)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-brasil (2)
- # clojure-greece (13)
- # clojure-italy (18)
- # clojure-kc (2)
- # clojure-nl (9)
- # clojure-quebec (1)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-spec (55)
- # clojure-uk (114)
- # clojurescript (18)
- # clojurex (14)
- # code-reviews (5)
- # core-async (17)
- # cursive (23)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (82)
- # docker (8)
- # duct (10)
- # emacs (8)
- # figwheel (3)
- # figwheel-main (5)
- # fulcro (13)
- # hyperfiddle (8)
- # jobs (1)
- # midje (1)
- # mount (1)
- # nrepl (2)
- # off-topic (72)
- # om (2)
- # pathom (10)
- # portkey (2)
- # re-frame (9)
- # reagent (3)
- # reitit (9)
- # ring-swagger (14)
- # schema (1)
- # shadow-cljs (91)
- # spacemacs (21)
- # sql (6)
- # tools-deps (19)
- # unrepl (9)
- # vim (41)
Seems pretty idiomatic to me. One thing I noticed is you could probably use (reduce +)
in place of (reduce #(map + %1 %2))
I want (reduce #(map + % %2) [[1 2] [1 2] [3 5] [2 6]])
(reduce + [[1 2] [1 2] [3 5] [2 6]])
doesn't work here.
...and I have a hunch that you could find something a little simpler than (filter #(apply = %))
, though I can't think of it offhand. (Using apply
like this is a faint code smell to me personally, though it certainly has its place)
Thanks a lot for your insights.