This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-10-29
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (2)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (141)
- # cider (33)
- # cljs-dev (13)
- # cljsjs (7)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (88)
- # clojure-conj (3)
- # clojure-dev (24)
- # clojure-italy (11)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-sanfrancisco (1)
- # clojure-spec (4)
- # clojure-uk (53)
- # clojurescript (65)
- # core-logic (2)
- # cursive (28)
- # datomic (33)
- # duct (2)
- # emacs (3)
- # figwheel-main (9)
- # fulcro (44)
- # hoplon (6)
- # leiningen (144)
- # mount (1)
- # nrepl (21)
- # off-topic (102)
- # onyx (2)
- # other-languages (5)
- # pathom (6)
- # planck (3)
- # portkey (1)
- # re-frame (7)
- # reagent (5)
- # reitit (17)
- # shadow-cljs (24)
- # spacemacs (16)
- # tools-deps (64)
- # uncomplicate (2)
- # vim (22)
Morning π I saw this in Twitter now. What a cool project. https://twitter.com/kylestetz/status/1056619925081534465?s=19
Morning
Hmmm could definitely have used another week off
do you have an office in Dundee @otfrom? Just looking at your cycling pics
gotta get out the house before you go stir crazy
is more the way I think about it
(I wfh permanently at the moment)
and with the shortening days up here, you have to be more careful about making sure you Get Out Of The House
I try to get out for a ride every other day (around 5 miles, and hills are pretty unavoidable in Dundee)
π So, Good Morning, Good Morning, Sun beams will soon smile through, Good Morning, Good Morning to you and you and you and you π
two years ago I left IBM... to come and work for a company that has no IBM tech what so ever... but RedHat stuff all over the place... how things can change.
Perhaps this will bring clojure π
Bore da
what's the buzz on clj-refactor @otfrom? I'm really enjoying joker/flycheck π
I had it ages ago. There was a period where it didn't really work. I've just re-added it recently. It is really handy for finding usages and cleaning up namespaces (which are things that joker picks up as well). So just feels like a good combo.
ah right
yeah that makes sense
I use clj-refactor a lot... haven't got joker set up yet.
I see quite a few places there are usages of (:require [foo.bar :as baz])
and (require '[foo.bar :as baz])
. Is it just a matter of taste?
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/require
Use :require in the ns macro
in preference to calling this directly.
Taken from the docsAs to why itβs preferred Iβm not actually sure, my guess would be something to do with the ns macro.
you shouldn't use the require
function in an ns macro. can cause very hard to debug issues
Wow is this new
@alex.lynham I use Joker for continuous feedback on linting, helping me avoid bugs really quickly. When doing production work I also use Eastwood and Kibit as described here http://www.bradcypert.com/2017/06/28/clojure-kibit-eastwood/
> Because Magit [...] makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot Everything I need to know π
mmm kibit looks interesting
Huh that's odd. Do you know why? (not that it's something I use every day, but still...)
@alex.lynham I got it wrong. kibit had a good suggestion
what was it?
oh the inc
thing :derp:
@alex.lynham I got it wrong. kibit had a good suggestion