This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-10-29
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (2)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (141)
- # cider (33)
- # cljs-dev (13)
- # cljsjs (7)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (88)
- # clojure-conj (3)
- # clojure-dev (24)
- # clojure-italy (11)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-sanfrancisco (1)
- # clojure-spec (4)
- # clojure-uk (53)
- # clojurescript (65)
- # core-logic (2)
- # cursive (28)
- # datomic (33)
- # duct (2)
- # emacs (3)
- # figwheel-main (9)
- # fulcro (44)
- # hoplon (6)
- # leiningen (144)
- # mount (1)
- # nrepl (21)
- # off-topic (102)
- # onyx (2)
- # other-languages (5)
- # pathom (6)
- # planck (3)
- # portkey (1)
- # re-frame (7)
- # reagent (5)
- # reitit (17)
- # shadow-cljs (24)
- # spacemacs (16)
- # tools-deps (64)
- # uncomplicate (2)
- # vim (22)
I’m somewhat surprised by how different the syntax is between core.logic
and what’s in the reasoned schemer, it’s taking me a while to find the exact matching functions. For example, I spent a while I thinking that conj2
was conjo
right up until this happened:
(l/run* [q]
(l/conjo u# (l/== 'corn q)))
=> (_0)
eventually I worked out it was just:
(l/run* [q]
(l/and* [u# (l/== 'corn q)]))
=> ()
But this stuff isn’t obvious and so far googling hasn’t shown that those two functions match. (Assuming that I’m right about that…)