This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-11-17
Channels
- # aleph (4)
- # announcements (2)
- # babashka (85)
- # beginners (136)
- # calva (72)
- # clj-commons (32)
- # clj-kondo (7)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # clojure (117)
- # clojure-europe (38)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-norway (1)
- # clojure-uk (4)
- # clojurescript (19)
- # conjure (38)
- # core-logic (2)
- # cursive (10)
- # datalevin (1)
- # datalog (1)
- # datomic (6)
- # events (2)
- # fulcro (16)
- # google-cloud (5)
- # graphql (10)
- # gratitude (3)
- # hugsql (3)
- # luminus (5)
- # membrane-term (12)
- # missionary (2)
- # nextjournal (5)
- # off-topic (3)
- # pedestal (2)
- # polylith (7)
- # portal (3)
- # re-frame (6)
- # reagent (26)
- # reclojure (8)
- # releases (3)
- # reveal (5)
- # shadow-cljs (14)
- # spacemacs (20)
- # sql (3)
- # tools-build (3)
- # web-security (9)
@dnolen if you had any time to review the cljs part of the patch in https://clojure.atlassian.net/browse/ASYNC-204, I would appreciate it. I added a condition level so it the patch looks bigger than it is - didn't change any of the big block that shifted, just split the !active and closed cases apart.
and ensure the test looks sane - I did check that it fails without the change and passes with it
1