Does it make sense that clj-kondo throws "unresolved namespace" for user ? The use case is I setup dev vars in user, then reference them in rich comments in source files. Guess 1 solution is to have the rich comments in the user file instead.

@benjamin.schwerdtner Just write (require 'user) to solve this. All namespaces must be required prior to use is the rule

For user this might seem a bit silly, but don't know if it's common enough to make an exception for that

does clj-kondo support colored output on the CLI to differentiate warnings from errors?

Does it make sense to have a linter about files without newlines?

I just stumble upon an exception that could be easily detected by clj-kondo but it doesn’t 🙂 After merging I’ve got duplicate symbols in defrecord definition. On the first look It seems easy to add an extra linter to kondo if it sounds interesting 🙏

is it possible to get the pre and post map from a function definition in a hook? or do I have to do

(let [children (:children (drop 2 node))
      children (if (api/vector? (first children)) (rest children) children)]
  (if (api/list-node? (first children))
    (->> children
         (filter api/list-node?)
         (map :children)
         (map #(if (api/vector-node? (first %)) (rest %) %))
         (keep #(when (and (api/map-node? (first %)) (next %))
                  (->> (:children (first %))
                       (partition 2)
                       (filter (fn [[k _v]] (and (api/keyword-node? k) (#{:pre :post} (:k k)))))
                       (seq)))))
    (when (and (api/map-node? (first children)) (next children))
      (->> (:children (first children))
           (partition 2)
           (filter (fn [[k _v]] (and (api/keyword-node? k) (#{:pre :post} (:k k)))))
           (seq)))