This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-08-14
Channels
- # admin-announcements (3)
- # alda (1)
- # beginners (12)
- # braveandtrue (4)
- # cider (9)
- # cljs-dev (109)
- # cljsrn (6)
- # clojars (4)
- # clojure (40)
- # clojure-japan (5)
- # clojure-russia (10)
- # clojurescript (42)
- # cursive (2)
- # datomic (6)
- # hoplon (3)
- # luminus (3)
- # melbourne (1)
- # om (4)
- # om-next (1)
- # onyx (41)
- # proton (2)
- # protorepl (1)
- # quil (1)
- # re-frame (6)
- # respo (1)
- # testing (1)
@kingoftheknoll: you eval'd the last sexp, which was not (add2 2)
but add2
, so it returned the closure which takes a param and tries to add 2 to it.
@dpsutton: and @malabarba ah I see it now. My cursor wasn’t at the end of the expression.
@akiva: not "requiring", just suggesting it as a "standard" — makes life easier when remote pairing if the Emacs setup is similar.
(no requirement to use Emacs either — it’s just a good "standard" tool in our opinion; we used both LightTable and Emacs for a while but the devs preferred Emacs)
Right on. I was just curious. I’m clearly a huge Spacemacs proponent and I have my config there pretty much locked up tight. I can’t imagine going into a job having to learn Emacs’ default chords.
@kingoftheknoll: It’s worth noting that C-M-x
will eval the top-level form, as opposed to C-x C-e
which will eval the previous form.
@akiva: I tried Spacemacs but just couldn't get on with it. Probably because I'd first used Emacs back in the 17.x days and so the "standard" Emacs keys seem normal -- even tho' I took a 20 year break between early releases of 19.x and early releases of 24.x 😸
@seancorfield, I’ve been a vi/vim user since the dawn of time so Spacemacs was a natural draw for me. It was a bit of a bear early on but it’s really stable and good now. And you can use it with traditional Emacs keybindings.