Fork me on GitHub
#asami
<
2021-03-15
>
mdallastella11:03:30

Morning, I'm playing a bit with asami-loom with the last asami version, but the example on the https://github.com/threatgrid/asami-loom#example fails... is asami-loom a bit behind of asami?

quoll14:03:30

@U052TDWT7 would you be able to file an issue on Github for this please? I can probably take some time to work on it immediately, but it’ll look better for me if someone else asked for it! 🙂

mdallastella15:03:12

@U051N6TTC sure, thanks.

👍 1
thanks3 1
mdallastella17:03:08

Done, let me know if you need any other detail.

quoll18:03:32

No, it’s more about the fact that it looks good for my boss if there was a ticket on it 🙂

quoll18:03:43

I’ve found the issue. It’s because I updated additions to the graph to require a transaction number. So I’m going to add a dynamic var to provide a default TX id, and re-introduce the old API call. This will need a new alpha release, which is a day or 2 away (unless you want to pull from main 🙂)

quoll18:03:35

I’m also going to need to extend the Durable graph type to the Loom protocols. But at a first cut I’ll get the in-memory ones going again

mdallastella18:03:55

No hurry, thank you! ☺️

quoll12:03:10

It is. I don’t know what’s fallen behind, but I can try to catch it up soon if you still want to look at it?

quoll12:03:41

(Some APIs changed, but most things should still be in place)