This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-04-07
Channels
- # beginners (41)
- # boot (38)
- # cider (17)
- # cljs-dev (52)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # clojure (200)
- # clojure-italy (8)
- # clojure-russia (50)
- # clojure-spec (28)
- # clojure-uk (45)
- # clojurescript (28)
- # core-async (9)
- # core-matrix (2)
- # cursive (16)
- # datascript (15)
- # datomic (50)
- # dirac (5)
- # emacs (20)
- # figwheel (8)
- # flambo (2)
- # hoplon (10)
- # incanter (1)
- # jobs (1)
- # leiningen (2)
- # lumo (26)
- # mount (171)
- # off-topic (22)
- # om (54)
- # onyx (2)
- # pedestal (27)
- # re-frame (10)
- # reagent (12)
- # ring (27)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # rum (2)
- # slack-help (1)
- # spacemacs (134)
- # specter (6)
- # sql (15)
- # testing (20)
- # uncomplicate (5)
- # unrepl (49)
- # untangled (9)
- # yada (29)
recursive-path
shoud be used directly on "path"?
ex: (transform [(walker ,,,) (recursive-path ,,,,) ,,,,] foo bar)
@souenzzo yes that should work fine
or you can use it to declare a top-level path or bind a symbol in let
I usually declare at top-level. but in this case it contains a lot of parameters and (probably) will not be reuse. I was unsure whether using in-line would lose optimization
you can see the produced code by wrapping it in with-inline-debug
the first time the callsite is executed