This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-02-23
Channels
- # aleph (8)
- # aws (2)
- # beginners (36)
- # cider (35)
- # cljs-dev (157)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # cljsrn (5)
- # clojure (97)
- # clojure-dev (5)
- # clojure-gamedev (3)
- # clojure-italy (27)
- # clojure-russia (11)
- # clojure-spec (19)
- # clojure-uk (39)
- # clojured (6)
- # clojurescript (87)
- # clojutre (4)
- # community-development (35)
- # cursive (8)
- # datascript (2)
- # datomic (14)
- # dirac (8)
- # duct (3)
- # figwheel (13)
- # fulcro (22)
- # graphql (20)
- # jobs (1)
- # london-clojurians (1)
- # off-topic (55)
- # onyx (3)
- # parinfer (3)
- # protorepl (39)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (26)
- # ring (7)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # rum (1)
- # shadow-cljs (107)
- # spacemacs (8)
- # test-check (4)
- # unrepl (3)
Does anyone have an easy workaround for icons not changing when the dom changes with fontawesome 5.0?
I opted for the hard route, I'm no longer using FA, but I guess adding metadata to the icon hiccup would work too
@theasp do you mean when you changed the class on the i
tag the rendered html didn’t change, or it did change but the browser didn’t accept it?
@lee.justin.m FA 5.0 uses SVG, [:i.fas.fa-whatever] creates a svg subelement which doesn't automatically propagate changes from [:i] when it's classes changes
if it is reagent i might be able to help diagnose, but if it is something quirky with fa i haven’t encountered it before
i never really understood how it worked. i just copied random stuff hither and thither and it worked and i never messed with it again 🙂
Reagent alternatives include: - keechma - https://github.com/keechma/keechma - Carry - https://github.com/metametadata/carry Non-reagent based: - RUM/Citris - fulcro - Hoplon My rational for using re-frame over pure reagent is given here: https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/blob/master/docs/FAQs/DoINeedReFrame.md
As to percentages ... my guess is that 75% of commercial Reagent use involves re-frame. That's an estimate based on watching the job ads over the last year. When Reagent gets mentioned, re-frame is almost always mentioned as well. Hard to know about individual use. Might be closer to 50/50 because individuals often want to enjoy the process of creating their own thing. But that's pure guess work.
@mikethompson great summary, thank you
@mikethompson I saw reframe slack channel is mostly empty, but presumably they’re here
The #re-frame channel is pretty active
#reframe is a bad alias I guess. I'll see if we can get it removed
Duplicate alias is gone thanks to the always helpful @seancorfield