This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-08-16
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (83)
- # boot (10)
- # cider (23)
- # cljdoc (24)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # clojure (138)
- # clojure-finland (1)
- # clojure-italy (12)
- # clojure-losangeles (2)
- # clojure-mexico (1)
- # clojure-nl (18)
- # clojure-russia (23)
- # clojure-sg (1)
- # clojure-spec (15)
- # clojure-uk (126)
- # clojurescript (94)
- # cloverage (2)
- # core-async (1)
- # cursive (98)
- # datomic (54)
- # figwheel-main (19)
- # hyperfiddle (21)
- # jobs (1)
- # jobs-rus (4)
- # leiningen (4)
- # liberator (4)
- # off-topic (15)
- # parinfer (9)
- # re-frame (23)
- # reagent (19)
- # reitit (2)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # rum (3)
- # shadow-cljs (244)
- # sql (4)
If anyone is testing the new version of the vscode extension that is brewing, together with Calva, this is important for a smooth experience: https://github.com/BetterThanTomorrow/calva-fmt#parinfer-and-auto-adjust-cursor-on-new-lines
Also, to save some time for people who want to test the bleeding edge version of Parinfer for vscode, install this VSIX package: https://clojurians.slack.com/files/U0ETXRFEW/FC8D62QGZ/vscode-parinfer-0.6.3-pez-testar.vsix
Let me know if this should be posted as an issue instead (thinking it might not belong there as I am testing a yet unreleased version). Anyway, is this behaviour by design?
(def a [:b |↩︎:c])
(def a [:b])
|:c
(Trying to show where I hit the enter key there.) I expect, and would want:
(def a [:b
|:c])
@pez The source of ground truth for figuring out if a bug is yours or in parinfer itself is https://shaunlebron.github.io/parinfer/demo