This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-09-02
Channels
- # aleph (25)
- # announcements (17)
- # aws (2)
- # babashka (72)
- # beginners (44)
- # calva (6)
- # cider (3)
- # clj-kondo (109)
- # cljfx (1)
- # cljsrn (31)
- # clojure (151)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-europe (36)
- # clojure-nl (5)
- # clojure-norway (2)
- # clojure-spec (17)
- # clojure-uk (12)
- # clojurescript (74)
- # cursive (57)
- # data-science (1)
- # datascript (28)
- # datomic (40)
- # depstar (15)
- # gratitude (3)
- # helix (3)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # joker (1)
- # kaocha (2)
- # leiningen (2)
- # lsp (70)
- # lumo (2)
- # malli (2)
- # meander (4)
- # off-topic (10)
- # polylith (27)
- # quil (4)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (24)
- # ring (4)
- # rum (1)
- # shadow-cljs (102)
- # sql (2)
- # tools-deps (48)
- # web-security (8)
- # xtdb (5)
Re din step-makro @isak : Kom over better-cond, som liknar ganske mykje: https://github.com/Engelberg/better-cond Via: https://clojureverse.org/t/how-are-clojurians-handling-control-flow-on-their-projects/7868 Via Clojure Morsels: https://us6.campaign-archive.com/?u=7b10f480a6da2974db7723f78&id=c562f30378
2
@ivar.refsdal Hmm good point. Jeg ser at eksemplet jeg ga blir egentlig litt kortere med better-cond (fordi man trenger ikke :return
og :when
)