This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-07-23
Channels
- # announcements (10)
- # babashka (7)
- # beginners (31)
- # boot (4)
- # calva (8)
- # chlorine-clover (19)
- # cider (12)
- # clj-kondo (27)
- # cljsrn (7)
- # clojure (68)
- # clojure-colombia (2)
- # clojure-europe (47)
- # clojure-italy (16)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-spec (13)
- # clojure-uk (39)
- # clojurescript (103)
- # code-reviews (8)
- # community-development (2)
- # conjure (38)
- # core-async (37)
- # cursive (2)
- # datascript (1)
- # datomic (31)
- # figwheel-main (22)
- # fulcro (18)
- # jobs (2)
- # jobs-discuss (6)
- # juxt (3)
- # keechma (1)
- # lambdaisland (6)
- # malli (30)
- # meander (20)
- # off-topic (29)
- # reagent (1)
- # reitit (16)
- # shadow-cljs (4)
- # tools-deps (70)
- # xtdb (19)
Although we Aquarians donβt believe in astrology, my chart for this week said I would say hello to a stranger
@raymcdermott further north that day is ruled by Thor
sounds like good money for Cognitect and I'm guessing that NuBank are making sure that they still get the support for Datomic they need
Maybe JUXT should now join <random other fintech company in the South of Europe> just for the symmetry.
I'd sort of presumed that was the way it was going to go for juxt (or some other big investment from a consortium of banks as I think that crux is at more than one and they don't like paying their competitors to use tech, but will join together to do it)
so this will make Clojure (and Datomic) more sustainable (financially) in the long run...?
should do ... I can only assume that nubank have much better financial engineering skills than cognitect
but still do Datomic support
Yeah, i think having a big corporate sponsor like a bank, with deep pockets, is ultimately a good thing. but i wouldn't hate if it remained truly independent (although, who can say what it really means to be independent?)
2300 datomic databases at 5k per databases is a lot haha
we should ask them? maybe they hit the 1B datoms
quite fast
afterwards they might not have as much transactors
you get better perfs all around, less data to carry around, easier maintenance (backups/restore & co) etc etc
there are quite a lot of advantages to do that. then you loose cross db queries I think (I am not super familiar with datomic)
you can probably do your controlling function queries separately. I'd do that in a relational database. Don't do analysis on the same DB you do transactions
you might even want to just store it in S3 and do something like aurora or other straight to s3 storage things
you can have as many dbs as you like though? pay per transactor instance?
I wonder what is the maximum load of a transactor.
I think you can get that from http://datomic.com