This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-02-18
Channels
- # admin-announcements (3)
- # announcements (7)
- # aws (1)
- # beginners (76)
- # boot (340)
- # cider (9)
- # clara (35)
- # cljs-dev (7)
- # cljsjs (16)
- # cljsrn (11)
- # clojars (1)
- # clojure (192)
- # clojure-dev (6)
- # clojure-madison (8)
- # clojure-russia (373)
- # clojurebridge (1)
- # clojured (9)
- # clojurescript (172)
- # community-development (1)
- # core-async (2)
- # cursive (7)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (12)
- # devcards (1)
- # dirac (63)
- # emacs (3)
- # events (10)
- # gsoc (3)
- # hoplon (1)
- # jobs (1)
- # juxt (20)
- # ldnclj (4)
- # lein-figwheel (12)
- # leiningen (1)
- # off-topic (21)
- # om (232)
- # onyx (64)
- # parinfer (8)
- # proton (21)
- # re-frame (8)
- # reagent (1)
- # ring (3)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # slack-help (4)
- # spacemacs (6)
- # testing (3)
hello - having a real difficult time setting up a package during the package
job, keep getting the following error:
Extracting 108 files
Sifting output files...
Sifting output files...
clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: java.lang.AssertionError: Assert failed: No .inc.js file found!
regular
(deftask package []
(comp
(download-svgjs)
(sift :move {#"^svg\.js-*/dist/svg\.js$" "cljsjs/svgjs/development/svg.inc.js"
#"^svg\.js-*/dist/svg\.min\.js$" "cljsjs/svgjs/production/svg.min.inc.js"})
(sift :include #{#"^cljsjs"})
(deps-cljs :name "cljsjs.svgjs")))
ah never mind, just cribbed a different way of doing it from another package. Just noting there are very little in the way of docs on the sift
portion of the file in https://github.com/cljsjs/packages/wiki/Creating-Packages - every package seems to take a different approach
@d_run: one way to inspect stuff within the pipeline is to add (show :fileset true)
which will print the current fileset. Should help debugging those kinds of issues
hi deraen, i’m here i see the tests failed due to failed checksums. should i do something to fix?
@robert-stuttaford: Yeah you should try running the package task locally and update the checksums to match new version
what’s the best way to go from here - revert back to 0.9.4 and make -1 into -2?
That would work also, if you don't need the latest version
ok, i have done that
thank you
ok, the tests are passing!
thanks Deraen, you’re a legend
Heh, thanks.