This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-12-13
Channels
- # adventofcode (84)
- # aleph (1)
- # announcements (2)
- # aws (27)
- # beginners (52)
- # braveandtrue (2)
- # calva (440)
- # cider (7)
- # clara (2)
- # cljdoc (26)
- # cljs-dev (70)
- # clojure (131)
- # clojure-berlin (4)
- # clojure-brasil (1)
- # clojure-europe (2)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-hamburg (1)
- # clojure-italy (4)
- # clojure-losangeles (6)
- # clojure-nl (14)
- # clojure-spec (7)
- # clojure-uk (25)
- # clojurescript (26)
- # component (2)
- # cursive (13)
- # datomic (60)
- # dirac (59)
- # docker (1)
- # figwheel (1)
- # figwheel-main (2)
- # fulcro (12)
- # graphql (5)
- # juxt (33)
- # leiningen (19)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (37)
- # protorepl (2)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (46)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring-swagger (1)
- # shadow-cljs (88)
- # sql (10)
- # tools-deps (64)
- # vim (24)
Anyone else seeing this while running cljdoc locally?
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: Exception reading CLJDOC_VERSION from classpath, compiling:(telegram.clj:9:11)
This could be due to a recent merge
that file is expected to be on the classpath when you run cljdoc with the production profile
can you check what (cljdoc.config/profile)
returns?
sorry for the trouble 🙂
you can try that but it's a bug that this doesn't work anymore
I assumed that the custom aero/slurp reader would only be called if the profile is prod
but now that I think about it that was probably a stupid assumption 😄
try just touch resources/CLJDOC_VERSION
if you want to get unblocked
I'll get this fixed later today
I think I'll just fix it now and we can save the time writing an issue 🙂
but thanks for offering it 🙂
I think something is up with CI as well. Errs at this step:
#!/bin/bash -eo pipefail
docker login -u $DOCKER_USER -p $DOCKER_PASS
Password: EOF
Exited with code 1
https://circleci.com/gh/cljdoc/cljdoc/1433?utm_campaign=vcs-integration-link&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github-build-linkshould be fixed in master now
you might need to rebase to get the change into your branch
I put a note in that ticket @martinklepsch, but I've released my pom-updating tool, and I have it generating <scm>
tags in the pom.xml. Let me know if it looks useful. https://github.com/workframers/garamond
YES! I already saw & it looks very good. Not sure I have use for the versioning stuff at this point but the pom.xml
stuff definitely looks solid.
@U6AE62UCT if you're still interested in working on the issue we discussed this should be very helpful: ☝️
@U08QZ7Y5S btw, the cljdoc link (about scm tags and stuff) links to a non-canonical version of the documentation
For now this is the canonical link: https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/blob/master/doc/userguide/faq.md#how-do-i-set-scm-info-for-my-project
Oh, I'll update the README, thanks
np, thanks for the toolz 🙂
Sure, let me know if there's anything I can improve. I guess one thing is I'm not sure if it's possible to skip the version-rewriting if you want to just rewrite the other tags, that won't be too hard to add