This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-08-21
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # babashka (39)
- # beginners (91)
- # cider (9)
- # clj-kondo (10)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (54)
- # clojure-europe (45)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-spec (39)
- # clojure-uk (21)
- # clojurescript (7)
- # core-typed (1)
- # cursive (9)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (2)
- # docker (3)
- # emacs (11)
- # figwheel-main (11)
- # fulcro (19)
- # java (1)
- # juxt (1)
- # kaocha (68)
- # malli (7)
- # meander (5)
- # off-topic (76)
- # pedestal (1)
- # re-frame (6)
- # reveal (1)
- # rum (2)
- # shadow-cljs (48)
- # sql (6)
- # tools-deps (47)
- # vim (8)
- # xtdb (23)
Did anyone try using edamame from Babashka?
It should work if baked in via GraalVM, since babashka uses it itself as well via sci
I’m importing it via
export BABASHKA_CLASSPATH=$(clojure -Spath -Sdeps '{:deps { borkdude/edamame {:mvn/version "0.0.11-alpha.13"} } }')
But get this
clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Could not resolve symbol: *clojure-version* [at clojure/tools/reader/impl/utils.clj, line 17, column 35]
Where would you like these to be reported? The next stop is with-local-vars
😬
I think i’ll try parcera
babashka repo or sci?
Done! Thanks
About https://github.com/borkdude/babashka/issues/549 I was actually thinking of pulling edamame into babashka itself, graal-compiled.
ah yeah that would be even better
Yeah i’ll try some of those things. I wanted to write a babashka script that would do some quick code analysis. Edamame is nice because it understands forms
Thanks!
We could add edamame to babashka, I don't think it will be problematic. But there's also https://github.com/babashka/pod-babashka-parcera
ah good point, thanks
That stripped the asterisks from around input, I was confused by that for a minute. Might want to turn it into a code block and fix *input*