does shadow accept the new https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/blob/6797f5b2932c4dcdc12a3d4f9580d7fb9ae4bbf8/src/com/google/javascript/jscomp/CompilationLevel.java#L30 ? I would love to play with it 😄

no point

same as whitespace as far as shadow is concerned

@thheller maybe I am not familiar with shadow enough, but in vanilla Cljs bundling is never done, so deps are read from node_modules even in whitespace mode

(talking about nodejs target)

is shadow-cljs doing that instead?

you can bundle node_modules files just fine with shadow

ok cool

BUT since node does not have the concept of an uberjar I do not recommend doing that

well but that is the point of bundling, you produce one single .js file

bundle isn't aware of npm either so it changes nothing in that regard

just set :js-options {:js-provider :shadow} for your node build and it will bundle everything

oh, I thought the GCC BUNDLE was for that

it just fails immediately when you try to include native packages

so you are saying that in any case it is a tool on top of GCC that needs to do that bundling

is there no "bundle everything" solution in the node world?

feels weird if there isn't

yes there is, I use this, one sec

https://github.com/paullucas/les-clj/blob/master/scripts/build#L14

browserify + uglify

but I hoped to have everything in one tool 😄

well like I said it WILL fail for any package with native code

any other can technically work. just isn't built for it yet.

kk no problem just inquiring 😉

BUNDLE will do nothing as its just a lighter-weight version of WHITESPACE

ie. no transpile

bit busy this week but open a ticket if you want a one-file option for node targets (similar to :browser)

should be quite easy to add

ok let me open an issue

no big rush

@thheller do you think it's possible to have REPL on karma ci builds?