This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-02-15
Channels
- # aatree (23)
- # admin-announcements (13)
- # announcements (3)
- # beginners (49)
- # boot (50)
- # braid-chat (1)
- # braveandtrue (37)
- # cider (72)
- # cljs-dev (25)
- # cljsjs (6)
- # cljsrn (37)
- # clojure (78)
- # clojure-berlin (8)
- # clojure-greece (1)
- # clojure-ireland (2)
- # clojure-madison (14)
- # clojure-new-zealand (2)
- # clojure-poland (10)
- # clojure-russia (149)
- # clojured (2)
- # clojurescript (49)
- # community-development (6)
- # core-async (37)
- # cursive (1)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (30)
- # emacs (4)
- # euroclojure (1)
- # funcool (1)
- # graclj (1)
- # hoplon (17)
- # jobs (2)
- # jobs-rus (45)
- # ldnclj (6)
- # mount (12)
- # off-topic (124)
- # om (270)
- # onyx (131)
- # parinfer (70)
- # perun (2)
- # proton (168)
- # re-frame (32)
- # reagent (29)
- # ring-swagger (8)
- # testing (9)
- # yada (39)
@tmtwd: @peterbak yes, the :key
is a unique identifier to help React improve performance
^^ http://facebook.github.io/react/docs/multiple-components.html#dynamic-children
@tmtwd: if you're going to use ^{:key timestamp}
you should be sure each timestamp
is unique to each item
I've mentioned this a few weeks ago, but in the mean time I've written the docs - Keechma a micro - framework for Reagent http://keechma.com/
if you have any questions, I've opened the #C0MDSV2LW channel, so we don't spam here
I have a nested for that generates hiccup, I need to unwrap the nested for for the structure to be correct. I asked this question on the clojurescript google group https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojurescript/pAxBVLYoBl4
@sonnyto as I see it you want to render a table row, with some dynamic columns, right?
I think something like this should work
My two cents .. macros should be used with reluctance and, for the most part, when normal functions won't get the job done. Macros may be easier to read, but hard to debug and update.
I like to use into
for that as was demonstrated before.
The solution in the google group is fine.