This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-03-10
Channels
- # announcements (3)
- # asami (4)
- # babashka (21)
- # beginners (97)
- # calva (32)
- # cider (4)
- # clj-kondo (7)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # clojure (70)
- # clojure-europe (27)
- # clojure-nl (10)
- # clojure-norway (18)
- # clojure-uk (8)
- # clojure-ukraine (1)
- # clojurescript (5)
- # datalevin (7)
- # docker (1)
- # emacs (3)
- # fulcro (4)
- # girouette (4)
- # graalvm (2)
- # graphql (9)
- # gratitude (3)
- # honeysql (4)
- # hoplon (3)
- # hyperfiddle (7)
- # jobs (3)
- # kaocha (31)
- # lsp (23)
- # malli (7)
- # missionary (6)
- # nextjournal (9)
- # off-topic (6)
- # pathom (13)
- # polylith (13)
- # practicalli (3)
- # remote-jobs (3)
- # reveal (7)
- # schema (1)
- # sci (23)
- # shadow-cljs (31)
- # tools-deps (62)
- # xtdb (8)
If i might ask a troubling question, i feel the side product of this lib, to make names shorter, but less recognizably, is the opposite trade off i would desire. I feel like tailwind short syntax, that this seems trying to achieve, is a byproduct of the lack of easy variables and ways to compose. Do i hold some misconception or do i just value things differently?
I don't know and have no strong opinion about it.
fair enough, i'm just trying to understand in what context this would be beneficial. It seems like, if i had to use tailwind like short hand e.g "w-31" it would be great. However, I find :width 31 to be more human readable. Is the goal here just to have less characters or i'm I missing something?
Sorry for the late reply.
Originally, I built Girouette with a clear intent to make it customizable. I made some components which are compatible with the Tailwind syntax, but that was not supposed to be its main goal.
To use width-31
instead of w-31
is possible and easy, just need to provide modified components to the make-api
function.