yes. (also entity maps)

in datalog, you just reverse the e and v bindings

yea. that makes complete sense and explains why I was very confused the first time i encountered the idea. I was trying to justify it in pure datalog...

thank you for the explanation!

If you're on-prem you can call a reverse-lookup keyword on the result of d/entity as well

I believe reverse lookups work for datalog queries as well

@U0MKRS1FX you cannot do this: [?e :foo/_bar ?v]. You must do this [?v :foo/bar ?e]

brainfart confirmed, thought I did that in my code, but I don't 🙂