Pretty quiet on the search feedback here! I’ll assume folks are digging it!
@corasaurus-hex I think I’ll make a tweak to searchset tests 🧵
@corasaurus-hex, I got the https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/pull/596! Care to have a quick glance?
tx! merged!
I made a change to the sanitizer and it broke the searchset tests.
ahhhh ok, for sure
It’s hard for me to easily tell what is different. So I’m thinking… I’ll save the expected result maps sorted so I can use convential diff tools to compare.
oh, good idea
Cool, thanks, I shall make it so!
(thanks for you little comment block to regen the results BTW, very handy).
I try to do that when data/code is hard to generate
and you definitely don't need to ask permission to make changes especially to improve things
those tests are pretty shitty tbh
Thanks, just wanted to run it by you for potential issues.
Hey, they are better than nothin’! I appreciate them!
oh for sure! the thing was that I didn't know the data structures well enough to generate input or anticipate output for a lot of these functions and so the tests came last
and it was just all repl iteration
there's actually a bunch of data we're sending back that I'm not using
ah, good to know, we can tackle that in round n!