This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-05-28
Channels
- # announcements (11)
- # aws (30)
- # beginners (98)
- # calva (11)
- # cider (42)
- # clj-kondo (4)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # cljsrn (5)
- # clojure (132)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-ireland (1)
- # clojure-italy (35)
- # clojure-japan (2)
- # clojure-nl (5)
- # clojure-spec (5)
- # clojure-uk (24)
- # clojurescript (71)
- # clojutre (1)
- # core-async (6)
- # cursive (9)
- # data-science (4)
- # datascript (3)
- # datomic (78)
- # duct (16)
- # emacs (14)
- # events (2)
- # fulcro (141)
- # graalvm (5)
- # hoplon (14)
- # hyperfiddle (2)
- # jobs-discuss (14)
- # joker (8)
- # luminus (2)
- # off-topic (7)
- # om (1)
- # pathom (4)
- # pedestal (7)
- # planck (2)
- # quil (1)
- # re-frame (14)
- # reagent (2)
- # reitit (14)
- # robots (1)
- # shadow-cljs (20)
- # spacemacs (25)
- # specter (1)
- # sql (122)
- # tools-deps (63)
- # unrepl (2)
- # yada (34)
i've been using kixi.stats a little bit and i'm curious if there's any obvious reason why that library doesn't wrap it's reducing fns to provide a non-transducer interface as well, so you can just get the mean of collection, instead of having to (transduce identity mean (range 10))
possibly one for @U050T8VTR
@U064UGEUQ I have considered introducing a basic API but never followed through because those functions wouldn’t compose in the useful way reducing functions do, and they’re so trivially constructed in client code e.g. (def my-mean (partial transduce identity kixi/mean))
. Worth noting also that there are other libraries that will calculate seq > stat more efficiently than kixi.stats if you don’t need the flexibility of reducing functions.