Is there a library that will parse html->hiccup such that the result is 'React style', so :colSpan rather than :colspan, and that also handles the :style attribute properly (for React), so that instead of {:style "width:60px;position:absolute;"} it outputs {:style {:width "60px" :position "absolute"}}?

So far I've tried hickory and hiccup-bridge.

For the life of me I don't understand why chrome keeps saying "Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'call' of undefined" for product_type.call while at the same time showing that the product_type is a keyword and most definately not undefined

Ok... console.log shows it as undefined too, but debugger still shows it right

And hard refresh and now all the function params are undefinde

Ah. Two functions with same name... Then it's really weird why the debugger kept showing that the values would exist

I am new to re-frame and not quite sure how to build a user authentication/authorization system with it. From what I gathered I should create an auth interceptor and place my auth logic inside :before section then inject the interceptor into every events reg-event-db and reg-event-fx that I want to protect. Am I on the right track?

@somedude314 Sounds right, but I am learning #re-frame too. You might want to try that channel.

hiskennyness: Thanks, I didn't know that channel existed.

I'm playing around with a simple project with only deps.edn and I'm not sure how to hook up figwheel to work with a custom ring handler. Do I still need to use figwheel-sidecar? How do I compile Clojurescript now? Do you still need to use cljs.build.api? Which figwheel should I use?. It seems Bruce started rewriting figwheel to work with deps.edn (figwheel-main). Does anyone have an example project?

Bruce's own flappy-bird-demo is too simple, doesn't show how to tweak various fighweel and cljs compiler options

@ag there's a #figwheel-main channel btw

but I did notice he wrote some notes about embedding in your server here: https://github.com/bhauman/figwheel-repl

oh wow... that's another thing I have never seen. Cljs landscape at the moment seems to be... very confusing

Yeah, a bunch of tooling work got funded and so there's been a lot of churn in that space

This is awesome! I guess (as usual) I'll pick, try and choose things... shouldn't be too hard (I hope)

"The syntax for defmulti has changed. Example: (defmulti name dispatch-fn :default dispatch-value)"

When did this happen? Is the syntax for defmulti in cljs different than in clj ?

@didibus That was probably changed long long ago. The syntax for defmulti is the same in ClojureScript as it is in Clojure. You probably just used some form that triggered that diagnostic.

That diagnostic will trigger if it thinks you have passed in more than one option. (The only options supported are :default and :hierarchy.)

hum, ya, I'm probably just having a brain fart, I really thought the syntax used to be (defmulti name args-vector dispatch-fn)

But I guess it never needed the args in the defmulti

Right. I often catch myself putting an args vector—it really goes in the dispatch fn

So now I'm curious, can defmulti be overloaded?

By that, do you mean multi-arity?

Ya, like 2 arguments go to one set of dispatch fn, 3 argument another, etc.

I think not, but I thought I'd ask

Any reason *main-cli-fn* doesn't have a default value? Would have been nice to default to -main for example.

@didibus If it were to default to -main, which one would it default to? (In other words *main-cli-fn* needs to be set to a function value, but it is up to you to set it to foo.core/-main, bar.core/-main, or any other function like baz.core/quux.)

(As an aside, now that cljs.main is a thing, its --main / -m argument is an alternative.)

@mfikes Hum, ya, good point. I guess I was imagining gen-class could still be used to identify -main. But gen-class doesn't exist, for good reasons. I guess it would have been confusing to have a no-op gen-class used only for that