clojure-spec 2019-02-22 | Slack Archive

jsa-aerial01:02:40

So, what is the status of CLJ-2320? In my case I can limp along with s/merge, but this is (according to the issue itself) a 'major' priority but does not appear to have had any activity since last June. OTOH, it doesn't have any votes either. I don't have an account so can't log in to vote anyway...

jsa-aerial01:02:44

Also, why would what is effectively a 'logic system' use short circuiting semantics for an 'and' operator???

seancorfield03:02:13

@jsa-aerial Anyone can create a JIRA account, I believe...

seancorfield03:02:12

I think s/and really has to be short-circuiting since some predicates may blow up if they don't have a guard predicate ahead of them...?

jsa-aerial16:02:20

@U04V70XH6 Sounds like a likely explanation, but in this context that 'should not happen'. Put another way, that should be up the user's predicates. If a 'guard' operator is wanted - call it 'guard' or some such.

cjohansen08:02:06

Is there any way to associate a docstring with a spec?

Josip Gracin08:02:29

not in spec1, AFAIK

cjohansen08:02:42

do you know if it's planned for 2?

Josip Gracin08:02:12

I should probably let Alex answer that, but I believe it will probably be in spec2

Josip Gracin08:02:27

my belief is based on previous discussions of this on slack and mailing lists

cjohansen08:02:58

ok, cool. I haven't followed either of those closely, so crossing my fingers 🙂