i think there’s a bug with :clojure.core.specs/binding-form. it’s defined as

(spec/or :sym :clojure.core.specs/local-name
         :seq :clojure.core.specs/seq-binding-form
         :map :clojure.core.specs/map-binding-form)

(spec/conform
 :clojure.core.specs/binding-form
 '{})
;; => [:seq {}]

(spec/or :sym :clojure.core.specs/local-name
         :map :clojure.core.specs/map-binding-form
         :seq :clojure.core.specs/seq-binding-form)

(spec/conform
 (spec/or :sym :clojure.core.specs/local-name
          :map :clojure.core.specs/map-binding-form
          :seq :clojure.core.specs/seq-binding-form)
 '{})
;; => [:map {}]

(spec/conform
 (spec/or :sym :clojure.core.specs/local-name
          :map :clojure.core.specs/map-binding-form
          :seq :clojure.core.specs/seq-binding-form)
 '[])
;; => [:seq {}]

i guess this is another good case for specs for specs. 😉

cc @alexmiller

There's already a ticket and a patch for this I think

http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2055

Same thing I think?

ah nice! yep, that’ll do it too! 🙂

(although my patch would have been smaller) 😛

(brandon’s is better though) 🙂

We really need a vcat which would be better than either

In particular to c

Conform to a vector

where does spec store registered specs? can i list / inspect them?

@devth (s/registry)

@bronsa thanks!

you might also find stest/instrumentable-syms or stest/checkable-syms of interest re functions

ah, very cool