is it a know problem that 1.10.439's stest/instrument does not contain ex-data anymore on failure?

I think so

look at the blocker tickets in JIRA

@richiardiandrea I see ex-data: https://gist.github.com/mfikes/9cc155578e64d0305045d0ba6b285610

uhm thank you folks, switching to orchestra for now, waiting for having more time for debugging

It might be related to expound, it rings a bell and I am afraid there was some incompatibility with 1.10.439

what’s the issue with stest/instrument not containing an ex-data on failure? can’t find it in JIRA

Hi there. Small paradox: doc at https://clojurescript.org/reference/repl#auto-loaded-user-code says we can have a user ns, but the compiler (as 1.10.338) doesn't agree: WARNING: user is a single segment namespace at line 1.... Did I miss an episode? Is this worth a ticket?

@fdserr The doc doesn’t actually say you can have a user ns. The namespace in that file can be whatever you like. The default, if unspecified is cljs.user.

Hi Mike. Let me please try to rephrase? I can have a user.cljs file (prolly in /dev folder), with a (ns cljs.user) decl inside, and its Vars will be picked-up at REPL startup. Correct?

Yes, and in that case the Vars will indeed be available in the REPL.

Awesome! thanks much.

@fdserr FWIW you can omit (ns cljs.user); it is optional.

Got it, just the file has to be named user.cljs right?

That, or user.cljc

If you see any improvements to the doc, feel free to contribute. If you read it you will find that it is consistent with the above, but perhaps it isn’t as clear as it could be.

Well, the time has gone when one could just propose edits on github pages 😃 do you think it's worth a ticket?

See https://clojurescript.org/community/contributing_site#minor

But, to answer your question: The docs are clear to me. But that doesn’t mean they are clear.

Lol, you pretty much invent this stuff, hopefully crystal clear for you ^ Let me re-read and consider this... Thanks a bunch for the heads up!

@mfikes Done. Greetings :spock-hand:

Thanks!