thanks @martinklepsch! Also looking for any opinions on “current cljdoc codox inputs” might evoke in you - and also on any misunderstanding/blind-spots on my part that you may notice.

Is the necessity of the impl.clj.tpl dance clear to you?

If not I’ll also try to maybe clarify that a bit more

I think so.

I don’t know why it has a .tpl extension, but I see the need to minimize dependencies during analysis.

.tpl extension is probably a way to emphasize that it is not used in analysis runner process.

Yes that’s pretty much all there is to it. Some tooling would also try to load .clj files which would fail due to codox not being a dependency of the analysis runner

right, makes sense.