Clojurians
#boot-dev
<
2017-12-21
>

This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.

martinklepsch13:12:02

FWIW I tried pushing a SNAPSHOT release yesterday but ran into issues with lein refusing to push a 36M jar to Clojars. Will need to look into getting around that but SNAPSHOT should be available some time this week. :slightly_smiling_face:

martinklepsch19:12:23

Just pushed 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT to Clojars. That file size issue was bogus on my end :slightly_smiling_face:

martinklepsch19:12:33

Running the tests on Java 9 required me to set LEIN_SKIP_BOOTCLASSPATH as described here: https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/issues/2149 Besides that I only had a small issue when running a project on Java9 which was caused by some module something something problem: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43574426/how-to-resolve-java-lang-noclassdeffounderror-javax-xml-bind-jaxbexception-in-j

martinklepsch19:12:13

Happy testing! :tada:

flyboarder19:12:38

@martinklepsch :clap:

martinklepsch19:12:36

np :slightly_smiling_face:

martinklepsch19:12:13

The make deploy target checks that one is on Java 7, I assume that is for compatibility of AOT compiled classes?

juhoteperi19:12:39

AFAIK, Clojure always compiles Clojure files to 1.6 compatible classes, and javac -target option takes care of Java compilation target, I don't know why the check is there

martinklepsch20:12:37

@juhoteperi maybe it’s because we’re not only compiling Clojure code but also some Java? idk.. :slightly_smiling_face:

juhoteperi20:12:25

I think all the modules should set javac target option

martinklepsch20:12:47

If anyone has thoughts let me know

martinklepsch20:12:52

(updated link with proper formatting)

flyboarder21:12:42

@martinklepsch should we maybe move away from launch4j?

martinklepsch21:12:54

idk, this issue seemed pretty uncommon and I guess moving away from launch4j would be a significant project on it’s own

martinklepsch21:12:13

If anyone is eager to work on this and can show it works better than launch4j, sure :slightly_smiling_face:

martinklepsch21:12:23

Not going to be me though :stuck_out_tongue:

martinklepsch22:12:57

AppVeyor is broken because it seems to download the current release from Github: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Deraen/boot/build/278

martinklepsch22:12:16

@flyboarder oh, seems like we already were on 0.1.33? :smile:

flyboarder22:12:40

yeah looks like someone beat me to it, not much has changed