This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-12-21
Channels
- # adventofcode (82)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (44)
- # boot (7)
- # boot-dev (25)
- # cider (1)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # cljsrn (14)
- # clojars (11)
- # clojure (210)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (4)
- # clojure-gamedev (2)
- # clojure-greece (11)
- # clojure-italy (6)
- # clojure-norway (6)
- # clojure-russia (6)
- # clojure-serbia (2)
- # clojure-spec (43)
- # clojure-sweden (1)
- # clojure-uk (77)
- # clojurescript (43)
- # cursive (1)
- # data-science (3)
- # datomic (32)
- # duct (3)
- # figwheel (2)
- # fulcro (71)
- # graphql (3)
- # hoplon (14)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # lambdaisland (1)
- # leiningen (2)
- # luminus (2)
- # lumo (14)
- # off-topic (16)
- # om-next (1)
- # perun (5)
- # random (1)
- # re-frame (19)
- # reagent (37)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # shadow-cljs (157)
- # specter (6)
- # sql (29)
- # unrepl (14)
FWIW I tried pushing a SNAPSHOT release yesterday but ran into issues with lein refusing to push a 36M jar to Clojars. Will need to look into getting around that but SNAPSHOT should be available some time this week. π
Awesome!
Just pushed 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT to Clojars. That file size issue was bogus on my end π
Running the tests on Java 9 required me to set LEIN_SKIP_BOOTCLASSPATH
as described here: https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/issues/2149
Besides that I only had a small issue when running a project on Java9 which was caused by some module something something problem: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43574426/how-to-resolve-java-lang-noclassdeffounderror-javax-xml-bind-jaxbexception-in-j
Happy testing! π
thanks a lot!
np π
The make deploy
target checks that one is on Java 7, I assume that is for compatibility of AOT compiled classes?
Anyone know?
AFAIK, Clojure always compiles Clojure files to 1.6 compatible classes, and javac -target option takes care of Java compilation target, I don't know why the check is there
@juhoteperi maybe itβs because weβre not only compiling Clojure code but also some Java? idk.. π
I think all the modules should set javac target option
Preview of the above: https://github.com/boot-clj/boot/blob/b19502f4e216a90658b358dd2fecb5dd682d7700/CONTRIBUTING.md#release-process
If anyone has thoughts let me know
(updated link with proper formatting)
@martinklepsch should we maybe move away from launch4j?
idk, this issue seemed pretty uncommon and I guess moving away from launch4j would be a significant project on itβs own
If anyone is eager to work on this and can show it works better than launch4j, sure π
Not going to be me though π
AppVeyor is broken because it seems to download the current release from Github: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Deraen/boot/build/278
@flyboarder oh, seems like we already were on 0.1.33? π
yeah looks like someone beat me to it, not much has changed