This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-07-11
Channels
- # babashka (13)
- # beginners (17)
- # bristol-clojurians (1)
- # calva (23)
- # cider (5)
- # clj-kondo (32)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojure (167)
- # clojure-dev (23)
- # clojure-europe (6)
- # clojure-uk (8)
- # clojurescript (5)
- # cursive (7)
- # datomic (12)
- # emacs (4)
- # events (6)
- # fulcro (2)
- # graalvm (1)
- # interop (10)
- # leiningen (8)
- # local-first-clojure (1)
- # luminus (2)
- # meander (36)
- # planck (3)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (3)
- # sci (2)
- # spacemacs (4)
- # sql (1)
- # test-check (6)
- # tools-deps (22)
- # xtdb (75)
i am confused by this line of documentation: https://github.com/clojure/test.check/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/test/check/rose_tree.cljc#L90
> Takes a list of roses, not a rose
Is it possible what was meant was actually:
> Takes a rose, not a list of roses
as the functions that follow (i.e. permutations
, zip
, remove
, etc.) all seem to take a list of roses, but filter
does not?
yep, that sounds wrong
I pushed a commit that deletes that sentence.
according to git history, it was always wrong
@gfredericks thanks! (i didn't chase down the full history, but i also found that as far back as a i looked the sentence was the same.)