This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-12-19
Channels
- # beginners (240)
- # boot (9)
- # braveandtrue (2)
- # bristol-clojurians (2)
- # cider (2)
- # cljsrn (84)
- # clojars (1)
- # clojure (195)
- # clojure-belgium (9)
- # clojure-china (5)
- # clojure-denmark (4)
- # clojure-italy (7)
- # clojure-mke (1)
- # clojure-norway (1)
- # clojure-russia (16)
- # clojure-spec (74)
- # clojure-uk (15)
- # clojurescript (78)
- # clr (3)
- # code-reviews (4)
- # datascript (8)
- # datomic (71)
- # emacs (9)
- # hoplon (18)
- # jobs (3)
- # kekkonen (32)
- # klipse (19)
- # lambdaisland (2)
- # luminus (15)
- # off-topic (6)
- # om (35)
- # om-next (62)
- # onyx (17)
- # overtone (5)
- # pedestal (1)
- # perun (1)
- # planck (31)
- # protorepl (1)
- # re-frame (135)
- # reagent (34)
- # ring-swagger (6)
- # rum (54)
- # specter (3)
- # untangled (14)
- # yada (14)
this is spec related but I'm posting it here so I won't derail all the great discussions happening in the spec channel.
doing a live demo of spec and a data structure you thought would conform is actually invalid, do you a) ask the audience if they can see what you did wrong? b) call explain on your data structure and see exactly what you did wrong?