This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-12-19
Channels
- # beginners (240)
- # boot (9)
- # braveandtrue (2)
- # bristol-clojurians (2)
- # cider (2)
- # cljsrn (84)
- # clojars (1)
- # clojure (195)
- # clojure-belgium (9)
- # clojure-china (5)
- # clojure-denmark (4)
- # clojure-italy (7)
- # clojure-mke (1)
- # clojure-norway (1)
- # clojure-russia (16)
- # clojure-spec (74)
- # clojure-uk (15)
- # clojurescript (78)
- # clr (3)
- # code-reviews (4)
- # datascript (8)
- # datomic (71)
- # emacs (9)
- # hoplon (18)
- # jobs (3)
- # kekkonen (32)
- # klipse (19)
- # lambdaisland (2)
- # luminus (15)
- # off-topic (6)
- # om (35)
- # om-next (62)
- # onyx (17)
- # overtone (5)
- # pedestal (1)
- # perun (1)
- # planck (31)
- # protorepl (1)
- # re-frame (135)
- # reagent (34)
- # ring-swagger (6)
- # rum (54)
- # specter (3)
- # untangled (14)
- # yada (14)
hey @kurt-yagram you should definitely checkout https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvk-Gnydn54
'clojure battles': I think there's definitely a need for people to know what to choose, because trade-offs are often not documented in libraries
about the experience report, just let us know when you're ready, we'll make sure to plan it asap then
she's a genius! Anyway, having some real-world stuff in the meetings would be really nice. 'clojure lib/tech battles' are definitely one way, but they stay more theoretical (although pretty much fun, probably. However, something like hand-on 'solvathons' - does that word define what it's about? - may be more valuable, if the problem statement/use case is rather generic. I'd say, in the case of solvathons, the person defining the problem should have some code available before starting a session. This makes it way more real-life and not a typical theoretical hand-on session - this sounds like a contradiction, although I don't think it is 😛.
An example of a real-life generic problem?