This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-10-02
Channels
- # announcements (12)
- # asami (5)
- # aws (3)
- # babashka (12)
- # beginners (86)
- # calva (14)
- # chlorine-clover (3)
- # cider (13)
- # clara (8)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # cljfx (2)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (69)
- # clojure-berlin (6)
- # clojure-czech (14)
- # clojure-dev (17)
- # clojure-europe (76)
- # clojure-france (14)
- # clojure-nl (43)
- # clojure-norway (6)
- # clojure-spec (7)
- # clojure-uk (13)
- # clojurescript (4)
- # code-reviews (1)
- # conjure (16)
- # cursive (2)
- # data-science (3)
- # datascript (1)
- # datomic (41)
- # events (4)
- # fulcro (9)
- # hugsql (3)
- # instaparse (5)
- # jobs (3)
- # malli (1)
- # mid-cities-meetup (1)
- # nrepl (22)
- # off-topic (25)
- # onyx (1)
- # pedestal (3)
- # remote-jobs (3)
- # shadow-cljs (61)
- # sql (22)
- # xtdb (12)
Has anyone made use of PGJDBC-NG, https://impossibl.github.io/pgjdbc-ng in Hugsql projects? I see that it has much better support for some of Postgres' features, like custom composite types, but I don't see an available Hugsql adapter for it yet.
I haven’t tried it, but pgjdbc-ng driver claims to be fully JDBC 4.2 compliant, which suggests that you could use it with the existing hugsql adapters for clojure.java.jdbc (default but older) or next.jdbc (new and better).
@U065ZC1BP He asked the same question in #sql and I answered there about using next.jdbc with HugSQL. clojure.java.jdbc was tested against the Impossibl driver. I haven't specifically tested next.jdbc against it but I can't imagine any issues...