This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-07-02
Channels
- # aleph (1)
- # architecture (4)
- # beginners (39)
- # boot (12)
- # cider (25)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # cljsrn (5)
- # clojure (175)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (1)
- # clojure-italy (13)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-spec (52)
- # clojure-uk (110)
- # clojurescript (35)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (61)
- # editors (8)
- # emacs (2)
- # fulcro (7)
- # graphql (15)
- # hoplon (1)
- # hyperfiddle (3)
- # jobs (4)
- # jobs-discuss (12)
- # juxt (2)
- # lein-figwheel (6)
- # leiningen (35)
- # off-topic (4)
- # onyx (5)
- # parinfer (1)
- # pedestal (63)
- # re-frame (38)
- # reitit (7)
- # ring-swagger (7)
- # rum (2)
- # shadow-cljs (27)
- # tools-deps (10)
- # uncomplicate (16)
Naive question — why aren’t Swing-based IDE-like tools that could be editor agnostic (things like inspector
are an example) more common?
Background — it seems like Seesaw makes creating cross-platform GUIs kinda straightforward, and of course you can launch those from the REPL as needed — so imagine things like introspecting a namespace/vars/atoms, configurations etc. So some of the functionality that something like e.g. CIDER provides could be also provided in other editors “for free”. I realize it’s a lot of work, and I’m wondering if this approach has some other inherent flaws…