This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-07-17
Channels
- # announcements (2)
- # babashka (1)
- # beginners (54)
- # calva (19)
- # clj-kondo (7)
- # cljs-dev (6)
- # cljsrn (18)
- # clojure (11)
- # clojure-europe (19)
- # clojurescript (7)
- # conjure (3)
- # cursive (7)
- # datomic (4)
- # figwheel-main (2)
- # fulcro (4)
- # helix (5)
- # honeysql (24)
- # instaparse (2)
- # lsp (20)
- # malli (17)
- # off-topic (6)
- # pathom (2)
- # practicalli (2)
- # shadow-cljs (2)
- # tools-deps (34)
- # vim (7)
Trying to upgrade a solo system to 884-9095. It is failing upgrading the compute group at this step: EntryRecordSet CREATE_FAILED [RRSet of type A with DNS name http://entry.datomic.us-west-2.datomic.net. is not permitted because a conflicting RRSet of type CNAME with the same DNS name already exists in zone http://datomic.us-west-2.datomic.net.] I am wondering if this is connected the new endpoint changes? My system name is "Datomic" (yes, not great), does this need to be a unique name given that it appears it is trying to create a DNS record based on this name in the AWS region?
I just created a system called dev-dcs
, so I have a private hosted zone, called
, which has 2 A records:
1.
2.
In a previous version of Datomic cloud, only the 1st record was defined, BUT as a CNAME
After a cursory look, neither in previous Datomic Storage or Solo compute CloudFormation stacks are any AWS::Route53::RecordSet
definitions.
There is however a DeleteRecordSets
lambda in https://s3.amazonaws.com/datomic-cloud-1/cft/732-8992/datomic-solo-compute-732-8992.json, which seems to clean up CNAME records.
So my bet is that u should just delete your current compute group and create one with the new version. You will have a few minutes down-time. Not sure how long it takes to delete a compute stack, but it took literally ~5minutes to create the new version.
(I haven't read the migration guide yet, but I bet this would work)
It takes 9 minutes to delete the 884-9095 compute stack. 5 minutes of that is spent with waiting for the autoscaling group to get deleted... would be nice to shorten that time somehow... :/
Thanks for the very detailed response; this solved the issue. Greatly appreciated!