I have found Silva's blogpost https://clojurescript.org/guides/promise-interop I guess I'll use core.async

if you just want something extremely basic there is https://clojureverse.org/t/promise-handling-in-cljs-using-js-await/8998

no extra dependency, no extra code, just basic promise interop

core.async might be overkill if you just want to await some promises

This is hard to answer, as ClojureScript itself has no opinion about that. ClojureScript is general purpose and not necessarily geared towards the web or React. To me (not knowing Elm), the question is also what you mean with “component” here. ClojureScript’s React wrappers like Reagent, Helix or UIx do talk about “components”, but usually prefer lightweight or even pure functions instead of OOP-style components. One popular framework is re-frame, which offers an event-based architecture and the “views” are (mostly) pure functions that return data in form of Hiccup. In Reagent’s terms (what re-frame uses), these are called “components”.

Fulcro is one CLJS framework that I would say is component-centric. This approach helps create an expectation of how to structure both UI nodes and data flow. It's not all rainbows and unicorns, but having this expectation does help with having a proven way of building bigger apps (especially where data update patterns are more complicated than bare UIs), and leaning on this symmetry to have better dev tooling and auxiliary libraries (routing, etc). So, while there may be competing ideas in the space, I would not say component-centric architectures are rejected. https://book.fulcrologic.com/#_the_glue_ui_components

@U922FGW59 Thanks for the answer! Indeed—from what I’ve seen in the examples in re-frame docs—components in CLJS frameworks seem to be mostly pure.

https://penpot.app/

http://hummi.app 😄

Hi @U050B88UR, I would like to bring the above to your attention please. It appears like a minor regression/bug manifested itself in a previous release. It is not clear to me what is the best way to report a cljs bug, and thus I'm going through to what seems a reasonable approach, ask-clojure (for stating the issue)->#clojurescript (for attracting some attention)->direct-message (as a last resort) in the hope of getting some feedback. Thanks

Thanks for the report I responded and opened a issue.

Thanks!